Warning: session_start() expects parameter 1 to be array, string given in /home/heuristn/public_html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 324
Using relationship marker fields for related records - Heurist Network

Related records are those records in Heurist connected by relationship records. While Heurist can create a relationship record between any two records, we strongly recommend creating Relationship Marker fields, which have several advantages:

  1. They appear as a field, with a label and description, in the data entry form so that the user is reminded to enter the relationship at an appropriate point in the workflow and sees existing relationships in context;

    Two relationship marker fields (activity and association) embedded in a data entry form

  2. They constrain the relationship to point at a specific target record type or types with a specified list of relationship types. This ensures consistent data entry and allows the field to provide guidance on how to enter the data;
  3. They can show relationships from either end so, for example, if a relationship isSponsorOf is shown in a relationship marker of one record, the equivalent relationship marker in the related record will show isSponsoredBy (assuming the correct relationship markers have been defined and the two terms have been marked as the inverse of one-another);
  4. The constraints embedded in the relationship markers allow Heurist to build facetted searches, custom reports and network rules through a ‘wizard’ approach, as well as plotting more meaningful network diagrams.

Relationship Markers build on the Record Pointer field type in that, in addition to defining target record type(s), they use a vocabulary to define the kind of relationship between the linked records, instead of just defining a link between records. There are some core vocabularies for relationship markers included with all databases – these include vocabularies for Family relationships, as well as Spatial and Temporal relationships. Users can define their own vocabularies for relationships to reflect different types of relationships within their own databases

Related records are displayed in a separate section RELATED within the record view (image above). This display includes the term from the vocabulary as well as the linked record, which is highlighted in blue and can be opened by a single click. In the example shown above, the only Related Record for Juliet Capulet in the Shakespearean play, Romeo and Juliet, is the Character, Tybalt, who is her cousin. She is also linked to various other records through simple Record Pointer fields, such as the characters of Romeo and Friar Laurence, the play of “Romeo and Juliet”, the House of Capulet and an actress who played Juliet. Note that some of these pointers appear in the data for Juliet – these are pointer which point at other characters – while others only appear in the LINKED FROM section as these are pointers in other records which point AT Juliet.

Related Record Lady Macbeth

The main difference is in the edit screen, where the type of relationship is included, as well as the record which is being related. In the example given above, Lady Macbeth is shown to be related in marriage to Macbeth (in the play, Macbeth).

Related Records Duncan

Furthermore, as well as the records to which one has defined links from the record being edited, the edit form also shows links from other records to the record one is editing. This can help to identify relationships that may not be inherently obvious in the data for that record. For example, shown above is the record for Duncan, king of Scotland in the play Macbeth. Two other characters in the play: Malcolm and Donalblain, have designated Duncan as being their parent (hasParent). Thus when we edit the record for Duncan, the reverse relationships from the records for Malcolm and Donalblain are now shown, allowing us to avoid duplication of these relationships, as well as showing the links themselves.